In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
The answer Is Rhode Island.
B. hears cases from all over the united states :)
It is most likely that he has damage to his limbic system because it is responsible for the inhibition of his aggressive tendencies.
<h3>What is the
limbic system?</h3>
This refers to the brain part that is involved in the people's behavioural and emotional responses and when it comes to behaviours, it is vital in getting our need for survival: feeding, reproduction, caring for our young, fight or flight responses.
This brain section controls the appropriate responses to stimuli with social, emotional, or motivational salience which includes innate behaviors such as mating, aggression, and defense.
Therefore, It is most likely that he has damage to his limbic system because it is responsible for the inhibition of his aggressive tendencies.
Read more about limbic system
brainly.com/question/10093550
#SPJ1
