Option 3: a 90 degree rotation clockwise
You can tell that it is 90 degrees because the original started completely in quadrant 2 and the final image is completely in quadrant 1. If it was only rotated 45 degrees the final image would be part in quadrant 2 and part in quadrant 1. It was rotated clockwise because that is the way a clock goes.
Hope this helps! ;)
The student went wrong in step three. the solutions should have been -3 and 5
You want to do to one side the same thing you do to the other side.
In order to get the n by itself you divide the 25n by 25. But in order to not change the answer you need to do the same to the 70.
![\frac{25n}{25} = \frac{70}{25}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B25n%7D%7B25%7D%20%3D%20%20%5Cfrac%7B70%7D%7B25%7D%20)
so n=
![\frac{70}{25}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B70%7D%7B25%7D%20)
which can be reduced to
![\frac{14}{5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B14%7D%7B5%7D%20)
so n=
Negative multiplied by a negative is positive
8 multiplied by 2 is 16
x mutiplied by x is equal to x square
combine them all up and you get ......
![16 x^{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=16%20x%5E%7B2%7D%20)
is the answer :-)
Answer:
Option A is right
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that approximately 52% of all recent births were boys. In a simple random sample of 100 recent births, 49 were boys and 51 were girls. The most likely explanation for the difference between the observed results and the expected results in this case is
A) variability due to sampling
-- True because there is a slight difference whichmay be due to sampling fluctuations.
B) bias
False because given that 100 random births selected
C) nonsampling error
False. There is no chance for systematic error here.
d) Confounding: There is no confounding variable present inchild birth since each is independent of the other
e) a sampling frame that is incomplete
False because the sampling is done correctly.