Answer:
1. Alicia studies for the first time at the university. Two trains and a bus, because she doesn't want to spend her whole life in a factory. ANSWER: Sometimes you have to work hard to achieve your goals. 2. But I think diseases have no eyes. They pick with with a dizzy finger anyone, just anyone. ANSWER: Misfortune strikes randomly, not just those who deserve it. 3. passing bums will ask, Can i come in? I'll offer them the attic, ask them to stay, because I know how it is to be without a house. ANSWER: Remembering where you came from can help you relate to others.
Explanation:
I hope this helps you.
Through a Tunnel is a coming of age story because it follows the life of the protagonist, starting from his early life, to his adulthood. We see everything that happens in his life throughout the story, how all of these events combine to shape his life and his personality, and how he grows into an adult human being.
There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
Answer A
It might be wrong
Eco
