The answer is 1.87 pounds heavier. This is found out by subtracting 2.8 from 4.67.
Hope this helps!
Answer: 7.5
Step-by-step explanation:
All you have to do is divide the base/width by area.
Answer:
Orange and pink, I'm not too sure
Answer:
(
h
∘
f
∘
g
)
(
x
)
is known as a composite function. Here's how composite functions work:
let's say that
x
=
1
. Your function
g
(
x
)
=
1
3
(
x
)
now produces a
y
output of
1
3
, since
g
(
1
)
=
1
3
(
1
)
. Within a composite function, the y-value of one function becomes the x-value of the next, like so:
g
(
1
)
=
1
3
⇒
f
(
1
3
)
=
17
3
⇒
h
(
17
3
)
=
17
Therefore,
(
h
∘
f
∘
g
)
(
1
)
=
17
Based on this, to find the function for
(
h
∘
f
∘
g
)
(
x
)
(combined from right to left, by the way), simply replace
x
in
f
(
x
)
with the function
g
(
x
)
, and replace
x
in
h
(
x
)
with the function of
(
f
∘
g
)
(
x
)
, to get
(
h
∘
f
∘
g
)
(
x
)
.
This, simplified, is equal to
2
x
+
15
, and therefore
(
h
∘
f
∘
g
)
(
1
)
=
2
(
1
)
+
15
=
17
Hope that helps!
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
