Answer:
The Social <em>Democratic</em> leader launched a broadside against both monetary and political union.
Today, the new members of <em>parliamentary</em> will be sworn in and begin their terms as lawmakers.
President Rodrigo Duterte has a <em>Presidential</em> campaign
Every <em>citizens</em> may claim the protection of the law.
The <em>Government </em><u>continued to heavily tax the people until there was a national revolt against the duties.</u>
<u />
Explanation:
<em></em>
<em>I </em><em><u>hope it help you a lot.</u></em>
STUDY WELL
<em />
Answer:
Generally, conflicts arise from mismatches between power, organizational demands and feelings of personal worth..
<em>Human relations view of conflict means to accept that conflict is a important aspect of any organization. Rather than seeing it as a negative or a necessity it needs to be managed. If all of that is right. Then an example would be; If one person agues that Alternating current electricity is better than direct current electricity and the other says the opposite. The outcome now is that it is more beneficial we use both in everyday life. A/C is a safer and simplistic use of electricity for power converters while d/c is needed to supply a constant frequency current to LED lighting. Without both sides advancing we wouldn’t be able to keep progressing. or maybe that is a bad example… Maybe you start a business and you feel quality is a better formula than quantity. But you have such a high demand for your product your cheaper opponents outsell you. So now you decide to make a part of the product with a cheaper material. Thus still being superior product yet the quality has decreased. But now you have achieved a higher goal than you would have otherwise. I think conflict helps a company grow but if it leans too far one way outcome will become someone else’s achievement. If you cut out all conflict you may never be able to adapt to succeed.</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
King John signed the magna carta
Answer:
C)
Explanation: I have found the rest of your question.
We had to avoid wounding Austria too severely; we had to avoid leaving behind in her any unnecessary bitterness of feeling or desire for revenge; we ought rather to reserve the possibility of becoming friends again with our adversary of the moment, and in any case to regard the Austrian state as a piece on the European chessboard. If Austria were severely injured, she would become the ally of France and of every other opponent of ours; she would even sacrifice her anti-Russian interests for the sake of revenge on Prussia. . . . The acquisition of provinces like Austria Silesia and portions of Bohemia could not strengthen the Prussian state; it would not lead to an amalgamation of German Austria with Prussia, and Vienna could not be governed from Berlin as a mere dependency. . . . Austria's conflict and rivalry with us was no more culpable than ours with her; our task was the establishment or foundation of German national unity under the leadership of the King of Prussia.
Which argument is Otto von Bismarck making in this excerpt?
A. He is insisting that German unification should be the force that unites all German speakers in Europe.
B. He is offering to defend German Austria from Bohemian nationalism in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
C. He is rejecting the idea that German Austria should be made a part of a future united Germany.
D. He is warning the Prussian king not to go to war with Austria over Russian territory.
- The answer is C because his argument at the beginning is saying that they should avoid wounding Austria too harsh because if Austria were injured then she will become the ally of France and his rival and that they will tend to revenge and conflicts of the Prussian state and that will not lead to an amalgamation.
nobody can see the words in this honzy
