<h3>
QUESTION A:</h3>
Graph B.
The information is presented most clearly here, being centered and climbing steadily which prevents the influence of bias in the presentation. As stated, his presentation is intended to be neutral.
<h3>
QUESTION B:</h3>
Graph C.
This graph tricks the human brain into thinking that the increase is less prominent than we might perceive it in Graph A or B. This is because it is located lower and has a shallower slope. The campaign that wants to prevent immediate radical action (action which would harm the native species) would want to use this one as it might convince the city counsel that the issue is not urgent enough to take such actions so quickly.
Answer: i
Step-by-step explanation: the awnser is i just trust me here
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-30%
Step-by-step explanation:
currently, the perimeter is: 4 + 6 + 4 + 6 = 20 in.
when the width of 4 in is decreased by 3 in, the new width become (4-3) in = 1 in
therefore, the new perimeter is: 1 + 6 + 1 + 6 = 14 in
the change in perimeter is: 20 in - 14 in = 6 in
now, the percent of change in perimeter will be:
%
BUT because this change is a DECREASE, you have to put a NEGATIVE sign before the value to inducate that it's a decrease, so
change in perimeter = -30%
For the question 5 I think it is yes but I am not VERY SURE
