Answer:i need help with this also
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Option C. His answer is not correct, because the same can not be less than either attend
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
we know that
substitute
----> is not true
therefore
His answer is not correct, because the same can not be less than either attend
Answer:
√
96
log
(100
)
3
^5
/ 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
225 frogs
Step-by-step explanation:
Total population of frogs = 300 frogs.
Observed population of frogs = 24
6 of the 24 observed frogs had spots
Which means , the number of frogs that did not have spots = 24 - 6 = 18 frogs.
We were told to find how many of the total population can be predicted to NOT have spots. We would form a proportion.
If 24 frogs = 18 frogs with no spots
300 frogs = Y
Cross multiply
24Y = 300 × 18
Y = (300 × 18) ÷ 24
Y = 5400 ÷ 24
Y = 225 frogs.
This means out of 300 frogs, 225 frogs do not have spots.
Therefore, the total population that can be predicted to NOT have spots is 225 frogs.
the total population can be predicted to NOT have spots
One equation with 3 variables cannot be solved in the sense that you can find "the" 3 values for x, y and m. You can observe that this equation represents a family of straight lines with varying slope (depending on m).
