Answer:
In 2003, Patterson was appointed chief justice of a "Special Supreme Court" that tried the case of Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore, who appealed his removal from office after he had refused to remove a monument of the Ten Commandments from the courthouse despite orders from a federal court judge to do so.
Hope I helped!
Answer:
skimming the passage, we’ll find “some critics” mentioned in the third sentence. Indeed, this sentence actually continues to advance Bigsby’s view mentioned in the previous sentence (that Hansberry’s work has “unintentional” irony” that the author seems to reject (stating that we should accept her irony as “deliberate social commentaries”). This third sentence continues to elaborate and broaden the critical view to other critics. The next sentence contains the words “for example,” so that must be the one, right?! Nope. This is the trap; the question specifically mentioned “examples” ad does this fourth sentence of the paragraph, but the “examples” need to refute this view, and the example in the fourth sentence is an example of the critical view the author disagreed with.
Explanation:
An important thing to keep in mind about the Reading Comprehension section of the GRE as we use PowerPrep online to study is that it is just that—reading comprehension. In other words, as difficult as it may seem, and it can be pretty tricky, the test makers will always give us all the information we need in the passage to answer the question. Select-in-passage questions, like number 8 on the second Verbal section of practice test 1, may look different than other questions, but they abide by the same rule.
Select-in-passage questions are unique to the GRE, but that shouldn’t scare us. In fact, a good thing about them is that we can approach each one the same way: we need to read the question carefully in order to find out what criteria our sentence needs to meet. Then, we need to search the passage for a sentence that fits that criteria—ok, admittedly this is sometimes more easily said than done, but we should keep in mind that our question may even give us extra clues as to where to look.
Answer:
What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this articleWhat would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?What would be the MOST important fact to include in a revision of this article?
?
Answer:
An adult is a mature, fully developed person. An adult has reached the age when they are legally responsible for their actions.
Answer:
She has decided to use words with strong connotative meanings because she knows they will help her arouse an emotional response.
Explanation:
What Zhu is doing is a well-known rhetoric appeal called pathos. She wants to provoke an emotional response in her audience with the purpose of convincing them of her point of view. To create the concern she wishes, she must use strong connotative words that will help impact the audience. If she can get them to visualize and "feel" - at least in their imagination - how awful the infringements on civil liberties are, she will most likely infuse them with apprehension.
