Alan Stewart Paton is a known writer from South Africa. One of his works is the novel "<span>Cry, the Beloved Country" which was published in year 1948. This book focuses on injustice and racism. In this book, the cultural experiences of South Africans during the late 1940s reflects the racism and injustice that the people of South Africa had endured and this was shown in the bus boycott. Answer is A.</span>
One rhetorical appeal in Anthony's speech that is ineffective is her use of pathos. In describing the American government as the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe, she made an assumption that was likely unfounded.
<h3>What ineffective rhetorical appeal was used by Anthony?</h3>
In her speech about women's right to vote, we can see that Susan B. Anthony employed pathos to raise the emotions of the people toward the government who did not yet understand the need to allow women to vote. We can see in her argument that she used an appeal to emotions by describing the government in very strong and hateful terms.
This would have hurt her argument because the audience might have been enraged at such a description of the government. Anthony should have stuck to logical reasoning to improve the weight of her argument. This would have gained more acceptance.
Learn more about Susan B. Anthony here:
brainly.com/question/14130938
#SPJ1
Answer:
Julie judges people both by their words and by their actions.
Explanation:
Parallelism refers to the use of sentence components that are grammatically identical or similar in structure, sound, meaning, or meter. It is considered to be one of the fundamental principles of grammar and rhetoric, adding symmetry, effectiveness, and balance to the text. Examples of parallelism can be found in literary works and everyday conversations alike. A well-known example of parallelism is the Latin saying translated as<em> I </em><u><em>came</em></u><em>, I </em><u><em>saw</em></u><em>, I </em><u><em>conquered</em></u><em>.</em> Here we have the repetition of the past simple tense.
Two sentences we were given are a good example of the presence and the lack of parallelism. There is no parallelism in <em>Julie judges people both by what they say and by their actions. </em>It would've been better had the sentence said <em>Julie judges people both </em><u><em>by what they say</em></u><em> and </em><u><em>by what they do</em></u><em>.</em> There we have identical structures. <em>Julie judges people both </em><u><em>by their words</em></u><em> and </em><u><em>by their actions</em></u> is a good example of parallelism.
Answer:
"The witnesses present."
Explanation:
Without passage 3, there's no way to know. Best guess is Choice 2
