B) workplaces
The location may be different but the job stays the same
Answer:
Louise's defense is not valid. She was involved in an Implied-in-fact contracts
Explanation:
Implied-in-fact Contracts
This is a contract that is legally enforceable as a result of an agreement made by conduct and from assumed intentions. These conducts and assumed intentions are derived from the relationship among the involved parties.
When Louise saw Midcity Painters painting her house and made no comments, she became involved a implied-in-fact contract. The conduct of Midcity to paint her house and her conduct to be quiet infact formed a legally enforceable contract.
Louise, therefore, liable. However, due to the lack of contractual terms such as payment for the job done, Louise will be liable for the nominally or typically acceptable rate for such a job done. For instance, if a normal house paint job costs $2000, Louise is liable to pay $2000 for the implied contract.
Answer:
$46,400
Explanation:
The computation of the absorption costing net operating income last year is shown below:
= Net operating income under variable costing + Fixed overhead deferred in ending inventory - Fixed overhead released in beginning inventory
= $74,000 + $0 - $27,600
= $46,400
All other information which is given in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
When actual revenue <u>exceeds</u> what the revenue should have been, the variance is labelled favourable.
Hope that helps!
Explanation:
See the images for answer....
I AM NOT FROM U.S.A I AM FROM INDIA
