Answer:B
Explanation: everything had a code of ethics.
In order to find out if employees are doing their job as they should in an efficient and effective manner, managers use performance management.
<h3>What is performance management?</h3>
This refers to anything that employers do in order to find out how employees are doing as regards helping the company to meet its organizational goals.
These methods go beyond trying to find out how employees are doing as regards work, but also tries to suggest ways that the employees can get better at what they do.
In order to do this, the employees need to be monitored and the process they use to go about their jobs need to be studied. They are then juxtaposed with industry best practicies to make them better.
Performance management is therefore hugely important in companies as it ensures that they meet organization objectives.
In conclusion, this is performance management,
Find out more on performance management at brainly.com/question/24673911
#SPJ1
Answer:
0.2 or 20%
Explanation:
The three possible outcomes, with respective probabilities and returns, as follows
Outcome 1: Probability (P) = 0.35, Return (R) = 0.20
Outcome 2: Probability = 0.25, Return = 0.36
Outcome 3: Probability = 0.40, Return = 0.10.
The expected return will be computed as follows.
Expected Return = 
= (0.35*0.20) + (0.25*0.36) + (0.40*0.10)
= 0.07 + 0.09 + 0.04
= 0.2
Therefore expected return = 0.2 or 20%
6/66
born with
talents
things you like to do for fun, such as cooking, reading, or painting.
Some people will share your hobbies, but others might not find those things interesting at all. The skills you learn from your hobbies can give you an advantage in careers in those fields.
You might also get to know other people who share your hobby, and this could help you build a career in that field.
Answer:
In light of research of Overstock's money related accomplishment, clearly these exposures influenced Overstock's trading cost. Theorists and customers of the spending reports despite everything have restrictive necessities that the self-governing reviewers ensure that financial reports are truly addressed. This has influenced audit and the board obligations and puts more weight on associates and authorities to appropriately address their financial rundowns. I think Grant Thornton acted inappropriately in light of their clashing use of the $785,000 A/R/Gain Contingency. Grant Thornton didn't from the outset prescribe making an altering section in this way Overstock gave their 10-k with the $785000 as expansion plausibility.
