Disruptive innovation are changes in products, services or processes that radically change an industry's rules of the game. By doing this, they are able to create a new market or change the value to an existing market. The disrupt the existing market and value by improving products or services.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Expenditures—2017 in the amount of $200. (C.)
Explanation:
This scenario describes a record that was less than the actual amount spent on the General Fund supplies. The amount recorded was $2,000, meanwhile the actual amount spent was $2,000. This entails that an amount worth $200 was not recorded, hence it will be debited as expenditures, but the question now is where the debit will be recorded?
This review was done in January 2017, meaning that the income statement for the 2016 Fiscal year must have been balanced, hence the amount will be an expenditure recorded in 2017, but the particulars will have a description that it was a carried over expenditure from 2016. Therefore $200 will be debited from 2017 as expenditures.
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
A company's income is either shared out as dividends or kept in as retained earnings. Therefore, the total of retained earnings and dividend paid out is the net income. This is the amount that will reflect in the income statement. In other words, income is calculated first before dividends or retained earnings are declared.
For Martinville, income will be calculated first before dividends are paid. Net income will be
=revenue - expenses
=$17,000 -$7,000
=$10,000
Balance in the Income Summary account was $10,000
Answer:
a. $700,000
b. 6/7 or 85.7%
c. No they will not.
Explanation:
a. Jacobs will earn the normal salary that the other designers in the other companies are getting in addition to the incremental income he brings to the company as a result of his talents.
Incremental income = Revenue with Jacobs - Revenue without Jacobs
= 1,000,000 - 400,000
= $600,000
Jacobs earnings = Normal designer earnings + incremental income
= 100,000 + 600,000
= $700,000
b. Economic rent is the excess amount that the company is paying Jacobs over what it should normally cost to get a designer.
Normal cost of designer is $100,000. Company is therefore paying an economic rent of $600,000.
Proportion of Jacobs salary that is economic rent = 
= 
= 6/7 or 85.7%
c. The company hiring Jacobs will not be making an economic profit because for them to make an economic profit they would have to be making more than the $400,000 that the other firms make. They cannot make this amount because for them to do so they would have to reduce the amount they pay Jacobs. If they do so, Jacobs would leave for greener pastures and then they would be making the same $400,000 that the rest are making.
