Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer: c. United States government . . . citizens
The State of the Union address is a message given by the President to Congress every year, except during the first year of a new term. Although the address is technically directed towards Congress, in modern times and through the use of technology, the address is broadcast live accross the country. Therefore, it serves as a way to give a message to the American people as well. The message addresses economic concerns, national priorities and proposes a legislative agenda.
Answer:
No I wouldn't. I wouldn't want to have that childhood because you don't have your own choices. You have to wear certain clothes. You have to go work in the field if you are a guy. The food isn't as good as it is today. Also not being able to have whatever friends you want.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
