Answer:
porsche
Explanation:
i don't know that was the first thing that came to my head when I thought of p
Answer:
The selling price should be $66K.
Explanation:
Capital Budgeting defines the future value as present value times the interest rate over the years FV=(1+i)^n, the following table shows both future values for Neighbor’s house and mine to calculate the differences.
Future value (FV) = Present value (PV) + (1 + Interest rate)n, where n is raised to the power of the number of years.
FV = PV +p (1+r) -30
PV = 60000
= $60000 (1+0.075) - 30
= $60000 (0.11422)
= $6859.26 + $60000
= $66853.26
.
Given this estimate, my selling price will now be $66K, making a profit of $5K, this way the future seller can either choose to buy my home or any other in the neighborhood since the future value will be the same even though the interest rate is 0.5% higher.
Answer:
$7073.68
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Worth of portfolio = $15,000
Amount invested in stock A = $6,000
Beta of stock A = 1.63
Beta of stock B = 0.95
Beta of portfolio = 1.10
Now,
Beta portfolio = ∑(Weight × Beta)
let the amount invested in Stock B be 'x'
thus,
1.10 = [($6,000 ÷ $15,000 ) × 1.63] + [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
1.10 = 0.652 + [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
0.448 = [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
x = ( 0.448 × $15,000 ) ÷ 0.95
or
x = $7073.68
<span>The predicted productivity equation is 2.0 + .5 * Experience + .2 * aptitude score . Then we can use the slope coefficients to figure this out. Jack gains .5 *.3 from his extra three months and Jill has gained from her extra 20 points on the aptitude test .2 * 20 = 4 . Then we have that 4 – 1.5 = 2.5 thus Jill is predicted to be more productive than Jack. Thus the answer is b.</span>
11.55% is the weighted average cost of capital for these funds
Explanation:
Firm has 76000000 in debt and 100000000 in equity. Thus the proportion of debt =
= 76000000/(76000000 + 100000000)
= 43.18%
and proportion of equity = 1 - 43.18% = 56.82%
Therefore, WACC = 0.4318 * 6.1 + 0.5682 * 15.7
= 11.55%
