9514 1404 393
Answer:
- Translate P to E; rotate ∆PQR about E until Q is coincident with F; reflect ∆PQR across EF
- Reflect ∆PQR across line PR; translate R to G; rotate ∆PQR about G until P is coincident with E
Step-by-step explanation:
The orientations of the triangles are opposite, so a reflection is involved. The various segments are not at right angles to each other, so a rotation other than some multiple of 90° is involved. A translation is needed in order to align the vertices on top of one another.
The rotation is more easily defined if one of the ∆PQR vertices is already on top of its corresponding ∆EFG vertex, so that translation should precede the rotation. The reflection can come anywhere in the sequence.
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
The mapping can be done in two transformations: translate a ∆PQR vertex to its corresponding ∆EFG point; reflect across the line that bisects the angle made at that vertex by corresponding sides.
Oh gosh oh I thought had the president of the
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-2x + 1
Step-by-step explanation:
1: -3x^2 + 5x + 2 - 1 - 7x + 3x^2
2: (-3x^2 + 3x^2) + (5x - 7x) + (2 - 1)
3: 0 - 2x + 1
4: -2x + 1
Step 1: Given equation
Step 2: Group the terms with similar exponents together
Step 3: Add the terms together
Step 4: Simplify completely
I think it’s C but if it’s wrong I’m sorry ☹️
