Each state would have two delegates in the Senate, while representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. Finally, the delegates agreed to the "Great Compromise," also known as the Connecticut Compromise.
Their so-called Great Compromise (also known as the Connecticut Compromise after its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) established a dual system of congressional representation. Each state would be assigned a number of seats in the House of Representatives based on its population.
The Great Compromise of 1787 gave larger states population-based representation in the lower house, while smaller states gained equal representation in the upper house.
To know more about Great Compromise of 1787 here
brainly.com/question/8242538
#SPJ4
Answer:
Life work on the manor is described below in detail.
Explanation:
The people existing on the manor were from all “levels” of Feudalism: Laborers, Gentlemen, Nobles, and Lords. There were regularly generous territories around the Manor utilized for cattle, hunting, and crops. The only people permitted to hunt in the manors covers were nobles. The feudal aristocrat of the manor made revenue by accumulating taxes and charges from the workers on his feudal property.
Answer:
Indus, Vedic ,Maurya, Gupta
The name of the law that was passed to replenish their ranks was the Civil War Conscription Act.
<h3>What is Military Conscription?</h3>
This refers to the bringing in of recruits to undergo necessary military training in order to serve their country.
Hence, we can see that during the American Civil War, there was great loss of life, and both sides needed to replenish their ranks, so they passed the Civil War Conscription Act.
Read more about Civil War Conscription Act here:
brainly.com/question/16040130
#SPJ1
Answer:
binding arbitration would end unrestricted economies all through a large part of the economy. Government authorities could direct wages and working conditions to any organization sufficiently disastrous to be coordinated.
binding arbitration would do the same amount of harm to laborers' privileges. They would lose all resources as of now accessible to them. Endorsers would lose their entitlement to decide on sanctioning the agreement they should work under, and they couldn't strike over the last agreement, regardless of how awful it is. Restricting intervention gives laborers an agreement if they like it.
binding arbitration could likewise cost laborers their annuities. Associations are probably going to press the mediator to constrain recently coordinated specialists to join a multi-manager association benefits plan, and in enterprises where these plans are normal, the judge would almost certainly concur.
Explanation:
With organization enrollment in consistent decay, Coordinated Work faces a decision. It can accomplish the difficult work important to shed the New Arrangement model that actually shapes its obsolete approach and adjust to the present economy. Or on the other hand it can utilize its political muscle and get Congress to make it simpler to constrain laborers to join.
