Answer:
2.
Explanation:
these lines of force would cause a current to flow in a coil of wire when the coil is rotated between the poles of a magnet
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
It has original jurisdiction in cases having to do with ambassadors and public ministers according to Article |||, section 2 in the constitution
Answer:
1. imperialism, slavery, mercantilism
2. Europe saw the colonies as a source of income and profit, usinf the univesal role of mercantilism, trade generates wealth and is stimulated by the accumulation of profitable balances, which a government should encourage by means of protectionism. and the natives of the land would get them those resorses for trade.
3. they often times gave benefits to natives that would convert to christianity.
4. the forces people to asimmalte to their culture by teaching them their sports, language, religion, ect. and refusal to do so could result in punishments however willingness to do so resulted in benefits
5. they will most likley come to hold distane upon them for the passed and making them assimalate to their culture and not allowing them to keep their native culture.
6. (i cant find the video but it should be stated if you look back through)
7. in hati they had more nations involded namley france and spain where as mexico only had to worry about spain. and in mexico they were led by a minister while in hati they were led by a former war hero and slave.
