The Miranda warning is a statement that police is requires to give to criminal suspects in police custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent and their right to refuse to answer questions.
Opponents of this practice argue that by having this process in place, police investigations can sometimes be undermined. I, however, believe that this should not outweigh the protection of individual rights. If the police is properly trained, there is no reason why they would not be able to find the information they need despite the warning, and despite the person's right to remain silent. Moreover, it is important to protect this right for the accused person as well, as it makes it more likely for him or her to have a fair trial.
1-As a general rule and in ordinary circumstances, the simple answer would be “no,” tribes are not required to follow the state orders. Under federal law, federally recognized tribes are semi-sovereign nations that exercise governmental powers and sovereignty over their members and territory.
Great Britain<span> was passing these laws because of the French and Indian </span>War<span>, which had ended in 1763.</span>
Yes,
The new policy of territorial expansion was motivated by both idealism and realism.
I'm sure its the six days war hope it helps :)
