In 1998, paleoanthropologist Rick Potts published an article in The Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, a peer-reviewed journal.
The article was titled “Environmental Hypotheses of Hominin Evolution.” In his paper, Potts claimed that great variations in environmental conditions over time were responsible for the adaptability of humans and the success of our species. Which would most likely be found in his paper? a review of modern human anatomical structure
evidence of changing environmental conditions, with references
the reasons competing hypotheses are wrong
his opinion of what will happen to the survival of the human race
The most appropriate answer would be "evidence of changing environmental conditions, with references".
As Mr. Potts claimed that great variations in environmental conditions over time were responsible for the adaptability of humans and the success of our species in his paper, he must have mentioned evidence of changing environmental conditions with references.
In addition, he must have shown the effects of changing environmental conditions on the adaptations made by human species due to those changes.
All of the options could reasonably be a part of the paper, and all of them would make the paper better. But one of the options is actually absolutely necessary: evidence of changing environmental conditions, with references- this is the correct answer.
This is because his argumentation is based on the assumption of "great variations in environmental conditions over time "- so he has to proove that there were those variations.
CELLS! Living things use energy, move, consume water and food, etc. Any individual form of life that is capable of growing and reproducing is considered an organism. All organisms get water and other materials from the environment.
The species that make up an ecosystem are connected in complex 'food webs' of eater and eaten. When one species disappears, its predators can no longer eat it and its prey are no longer eaten by it. Changes in these populations affect others. Not only that but the ecosystem would be dramatically different or cease to exist altogether.
