Two treatises of government
Answer:
Let’s analyze this conflict from the perspective of a conservation biologist.
Explanation:
<u>Conservation biologist</u> knows the<em> value of all species naturally present in a given ecosystem and the need to maintain balance in numbers of each species. Thus, uncontrolled hunting of wild carnivores may lead to reduction in their number and ultimately endanger the given species of carnivores in a particular country</em>.
Meanwhile, conservation biologist understands that certain people perceive <em>commons</em>, as a shared resource system, in a different way. In particular, people with particular interest and needs (<u>farmers and ranchers</u>), affected by the natural functioning of this system. From their perspective, resources that do not belong to any other particular individual and which are considered to be common, can be neglected if they interfere with farmer business. If the commons are unregulated it can lead to a greater abuse, thus the 'tragedy of commons'.
well it was hard because a probably didn't know how to speak English so it would be hard for them to get a job and sometimes if they didn't have legal documents it would be hard for them to actually get a job so they would have to lies about their identity to work they can live in shelters or apartments but sometimes they don't know where to go
Effects, ideals, and obligations or responsibilities.
