Answer:
The correct answer is $12
Step-by-step explanation:
To check, subtract 12 from 31
31 - 12 =19
Multiply 19 by 2
19 x 2 =38
Add 12
38 + 12 =50
Answer:
Option B is not a justification
Step-by-step explanation:
Option A is a justification (to get two pair of similar triangles (ABC-ACD) and (ABC-BCD))
Option C is a justification (a^2 = cy, b^2 = cx, a^2 + b^2 = cy + cx)
Option D is a justification (a^2 + b^2 = cy + cx = c(y + x) = c^2)
=> Option B is not a justification
Answer:
For less than 7 uniforms.
Step-by-step explanation:
The first company she called charges $70 per uniform.
So, the cost of x uniforms will be $70x.
The second company she called charges $280 plus $30 per uniform.
So, the cost of x uniform will be $(280 + 30x).
Now, if the total cost of purchasing x number of uniforms from the first company is less than that from the second company then, we can write the inequality equation as
70x < 280 + 30x
⇒ 70x - 30x < 280
⇒ 40x < 280
⇒ x < 7
Therefore, for less than 7 uniforms the cost from the first company will be less than the cost from the second company. (Answer)
Considering the situation described, we have that:
- The appropriate null hypotheses is
.
- The appropriate alternative hypotheses is
.
<h3>What are the hypotheses tested?</h3>
At the null hypotheses, it is tested if the mean has not been reduced, that is, it still is of 5.2 hours, hence:
.
At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the mean has been reduced, that is, it is now of less than 5.2 hours, hence:
More can be learned about hypotheses tests at brainly.com/question/26454209
