Answer:
Covariation of cause and effect
Explanation:
According to my research on different causes of behavior, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term that best exemplifies this is Covariation of cause and effect. This term refers to the process of establishing that there is a cause and effect to relationship between the variables. In this situation the cause would be reading more newspapers, and the effect would be that the students display more knowledge of current events.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The agency within the Executive Office of the President that is responsible for how natural resources are used is the Council on Environmental Quality.
Explanation:
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is an advisory body in the Executive Office of the President, available to the President and the Federal Government when they need advice on environmental issues, both nationally and internationally. Its chairman since 2019 is Mary Neumayr.
CEQ was formed in 1969 when President Richard Nixon and his administration passed the National Environmental Policy Act. CEQ also received additional powers with the Environmental Quality Improvement Act one year later.
I'm assuming bias, as a person's innate beliefs and the biases resulting from them can affect how they receive and comprehend information, and how they portray it. For example, American conservatives are more likely to read and trust information from right-winged media than left-wing, and vice versa with liberals/progressives.
Answer:
B. oil-drilling equipment
Explanation:
Information down below:
<span>I believe the correct answer is: Concurring opinion.
The concurring opinion is the term used in law that refers to an opinion written by judge/judges of court which agrees with the majority, but outlines additional considerations (different reasons) he or she thinks are important.
Even though Concurring opinions can’t change the final decision, but can serve as a persuasive argument for lawyers, in many legal systems these opinions are not reported as the court "speaks with one voice".</span>
