Which sentence from "The Great Energy Debate" provides evidence of the need for alternate

1 answer:

5 0

The sentence that provides evidence of the need for alternate energy can be gotten through the context clues provided.

<h3>What are context clues?</h3>

Your information is incomplete as the passage isn't given. Therefore, an overview will be given. It should be noted that context clues are the hints that can be found in a passage or story.

In this case, it's important to read and understand the story. Also, look out for the theme in the story. It's also important to look for the context clues that are provided. This will help guide your answer.

Learn more about context clues on:

brainly.com/question/24750804

You might be interested in

Which sentence has correct subject and verb agreement? A) We be planning to celebrate all night. B) Both of my older sisters pla

Arlecino [84]

Neither Carla nor Tim plays in the marching band is the sentence with the correct subject-verb agreement.

Explanation:

In the context of linguistics, the term agreement refers to words changing their form in a certain way that depends on the other words to which they relate.

According to the subject-verb agreement, the verb and the subject must agree in number. This means that, if the verb is singular, the subject must also be singular, and the other way around.

An example of the correct subject-verb agreement is the sentence Neither Carla nor Tim plays in the marching band. Even if there are two subjects in the given case, the verb is singular. When the subjects are both singular and are connected by the words or, nor, neither/nor, either/or, or not only/but also, the verb is also singular.

Sentence A is incorrect as we is a plural noun and should be used with the plural verb (are instead of be). Sentences B and C are similar. Sisters is plural, so instead of plays, the form play should be used. Frogs is also plural, and the correct form of the verb would be croak.

Learn more about parts of speech here: brainly.com/question/8448540

#LearnWithBrainly

3 0

2 years ago

Read the poem.

Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer: B. Locking women away behind walls, screens, or curtains robs them of their dignity.

Explanation:

The author of this poem, Sarojini Naidu (1879 - 1946), came from a culture where women were to receive a different treatment from men. Women's freedom was taken away with the excuse of protecting them from "eyes impure". If their bodies and faces, their beauty and youth cannot be seen, then they will not be coveted. However, such a way of "protecting" has its own way of harming those involved. It does not "shield a woman's eyes from tears". It does not protect their feelings, does not take their wishes into consideration. It only limits their lives, their abilities, their happiness.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

NO LINKS OR ELSE YOU'LL BE REPORTED! Only answer if you're very good at English.

Mice21 [21]

Answer:

I think it is D..........

5 0

3 years ago

What was Mr. Grave's dying request?

raketka [301]

Greeting's!

D. he wanted the other members of the donner party to eat the flesh of his body once he died, so they could live
________________________________________________________________________________________

5 0

3 years ago

Which part/phrase/sentence in the passage is a reason due to which Jake may be disqualified to be a juror?

AURORKA [14]

Answer:

because he messed up and probaly did something he wasnt supposed to be doing

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago