<span>Pacific i think is the answer to your question
</span>
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
The society's members. This is because the perspective of the functionalist lies mostly on the social consensus among the members of the society. With this, functionalists believe that the people are the ones who make the society through their own acts of making the society prosper.
I think it ..Increased political participation among all ethnic groups in South Africa
because the apartheid Increased political participation among all ethnic groups to make ethnic group equal on politice
Answer: Functionalist perspective.
Explanation:
Functionalist perspective is the point of view in which society is complex community as a whole.This society system is made for inducing unity as well as stability in people. Psychologist believe that society is made through interconnection.
The complete society structure is formed in which components are dependent on each other so that balance and harmony of the system can be maintained for performing operations.
