Answer:
Confirmation bias is the tendency for people with strong prior beliefs, when confronted with a choice, to make their decisions based on assumptions they’ve already made.
Explanation:
Confirmation bias is a tendency in human behavior to unknowingly be selectively aware of information that confirms our own perceptions. Confirmation bias is a type of cognitive bias.
If you have a negative self-image, you tend to get stuck on criticism and not hear praise. Scientific researchers, too, tend to be selectively aware of research results that are consistent with their own theory and unconsciously ignore those that contradict it. A confirmation bias risks leading to a superstition on personal opinions, while rebuttal and alternative sources are ignored. This can lead to disastrously wrong decisions, especially in scientific, political and military contexts.
<span>The president doesn't do very much. He can pardon people, but it's fairly rare. Indirectly, he appoints federal judges, who can mete out sentences.
If this helped please give stars and a thanks ^.^ much appreciated!
</span>
Answer:
The natural resources of the New England Colonies included fish, whales, trees and furs.
Answer: The Federalist Papers
Explanation: the federalist papers written under the pseudonym *Publius* were a series of articles and essay by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. The papers were written in an atempt to sway publiv opinion and persuade voters towards ratification of the Constitution. It was commonly referred to as the Federalist and became the Federalist Papers in the 20th century.
The Federalist Papers are still relevant till date as federal judges refer to it in the interpretation of the Constitution. They are used to clarify and simplify what the framers of the Constitution intended. Their importance can be seen in how much they are referred to when making decisions; as at year 2000, The Federalist Papers had been quoted 291 times in Supreme Court decisions.
Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
