Answer:
Department M
Manufacturing overhead rate = $600,000/200,000 hrs = $3/hr
Department A
Manufacturing overhead rate = $400,000/800,000 hrs = $0.5/hr
Manufacturing overhead cost allocated:
Department M = $3 x 8,000 = $24,000
Department A = $0.5 x 12,000 = $6,000
Total manufacturing cost allocated = $30,000
Explanation:
This relates to overhead absorption. The manufacturing overhead rate is calculated as budgeted manufacturing overhead divided by budgeted direct labour hour.
Manufacturing overhead allocated = manufacturing overhead rate x actual labour hour for each department for the job.
If a union is able to sell its labor to a for-profit business, then the business is likely to D. pay wages above the market equilibrium for wages.
<h3>What do unions do?</h3>
Unions negotiate a higher rate of pay for their member thanks to their power to initiate industrial actions.
this means that when they are able to get a company to hire their members, that company would likely pay above the equilibrium wage in the market.
Options for this question at:
A. pay wages exactly where the demand and supply labor curves intersect
B. pay wages below the market equilibrium for wages
C. pay wages matching the preferred equilibrium wage chosen by these businesses
D. pay wages above the market equilibrium for wages
Find out more on the role of unions at brainly.com/question/881501.
#SPJ1
B. Superiority of certain races. Which often results in discrimination and prejudice towards people based on their race or ethnicity
Answer:
Decrease of $18,000
Explanation:
As there is a payment of dividend so it would reduce the stockholder equity by $50,000
And, there is an increase in account receivable for rendering the service that means the service revenue would increased so the stockholder equity would increased by $32,000
Now the net effect would be
= -$50,000 + $32,000
= -$18,000
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
Trademark infringement refers to the violation of the exclusive privileges assigned to a trademark without including the permission of the trademark owner and any licensee Violation that arise when one person, the "infringer," uses a trademark that is equivalent or ambiguously related to a trademark used by some other group in connection to goods or services that are equivalent or identical to the goods or services.
Where the corresponding marks and products are wholly different, violation of the trademark could still be identified if the recorded label is well recognized under the Paris Agreement. In the U.s a cause of litigation is termed trademark dilution with the use of a label for such significantly different facilities.
