1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zigmanuir [339]
4 years ago
14

Strong supporters of Manifest Destiny believed it was acceptable to

History
2 answers:
Tamiku [17]4 years ago
4 0

Supporters of Manifest Destiny believed it was acceptable to remove Native Americans from their land in order to open it for white settlement.

Manifest Destiny is the belief that it is the United States god-given right to expand and control almost all of the territory in the North American continent. More specifically, the US wanted to control all land inbetween the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean. In order to do this, the US would have to take land away from Native Americans (who controlled numerous parts of North America at this time). This resulted in laws like the Indian Removal Act (1830).

Naddika [18.5K]4 years ago
3 0
Expand outward within the US no matter what it is in the way. They thought it was fine to take land from the Native Americans.
You might be interested in
How did the black codes impact the lives of the freedmen ?
zysi [14]
<h3>Hello!</h3><h3>First, I would review what the freedmen and the black codes are.</h3>

Freedmen - The freedmen are the group of slaves that were released from their previous masters, the freed slaves.

Black Codes - The black codes were a set of rules that applied to black people, passed back in the slave era. They included rules that restricted the ownership of property, relationships with white women, etc.

<h3>These therefore impacted the lives of the freedmen, as it restricted their actions.</h3>

The rules caused them to have to watch what they were doing in public spaces, or else there would be bad consequences (If you want to further look into the bad consequences, the story of Emmett Till is an example)

<h3>Hope this helped!</h3>
4 0
3 years ago
when the fortress of Masada fell to the Romans, Jewish defenders took their own lives rather than surrender. what does this deci
Nataliya [291]
When the fortress of Masada fell to the Romans, Jewish defenders took their own lives rather than surrender.
3 0
2 years ago
I’ll mark u as brainlist if u get this right
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

#A

Explanation:

I am positive it is A because the Americans were having a war with Britten's for freedom.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is an executive order allowed to do? What is it not allowed<br> to do?
Lady_Fox [76]
An executive order is a signed, written, and published directive from the President of the United States that manages operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively, so executive orders may be referenced by their assigned number, or their topic. Other presidential documents are sometimes similar to executive orders in their format, formality, and issue, but have different purposes. Proclamations, which are also signed and numbered consecutively, communicate information on holidays, commemorations, federal observances, and trade. Administrative orders—e.g. memos, notices, letters, messages—are not numbered, but are still signed, and are used to manage administrative matters of the federal government. All three types of presidential documents—executive orders, proclamations, and certain administrative orders—are published in the Federal Register, the daily journal of the federal government that is published to inform the public about federal regulations and actions. They are also catalogued by the National Archives as official documents produced by the federal government. Both executive orders and proclamations have the force of law, much like regulations issued by federal agencies, so they are codified under Title 3 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which is the formal collection of all of the rules and regulations issued by the executive branch and other federal agencies.
Executive orders are not legislation; they require no approval from Congress, and Congress cannot simply overturn them. Congress may pass legislation that might make it difficult, or even impossible, to carry out the order, such as removing funding. Only a sitting U.S. President may overturn an existing executive order by issuing another executive order to that effect.

4 0
3 years ago
What does president johnson say he wants to be remembered for?
Leona [35]
<span> Johnson believed that his greatest accomplishment as President of the United States was ensuring the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. That law authorized the federal government to step in to safeguard the right of African Americans to register to vote and cast their ballots.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was “the shot heard around the world”? A. the Boston Massacre B. the Battle of Saratoga C. the publication of the Declarati
    9·1 answer
  • Which nation was required to pay wartime damages by the treaty of Versailles
    13·2 answers
  • As the Arab empire declined, why did Islam continue to spread?
    14·1 answer
  • What will be the next year represented by the dragon?
    7·1 answer
  • How did businesses distribute or sell their products during the Second Industrial Revolution? assembly lines
    13·2 answers
  • I have this question. If you can answer it, answer it. If you can't, whatever. Anyway, how did Europe attempt to reestablish sta
    6·1 answer
  • Write one importance of periodic table
    6·2 answers
  • By signing the SALT Agreement, the United States and the Soviet Union agreed to __________.
    8·1 answer
  • 3/4 -5/12 .........................​
    13·1 answer
  • How did the spread of islam affect sw asia?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!