Answer:
This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.
Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.
We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.
But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.
If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.
The staff follows this schedule because of Cassandra's legitimate power.
- As a result, the organization as a whole and the followers' attitudes change for the better.
- The four I's, often known as the four distinguishing behaviors of transformational leaders, are typically displayed.
- Inspirational motivation, idealized influence, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration are examples of these activities.
- Personalized power, or power oriented at assisting oneself, can be used to advance one's own selfish goals rather than those of others or the organization.
- This type of power can give the word "power" a negative reputation.
<h3>Which of the following are considered soft influence tactics?</h3>
- Personal appeal, consultation, inspirational appeal, ingratiation, and reasonable persuasion are examples of soft methods.
- Compared to strong methods, soft techniques provide the person being persuaded greater freedom in determining whether or not to accept the influence.
Learn more about legitimate power
brainly.com/question/4584133
#SPJ4
Answer:
personal distress, maladaptive behaviour, and deviance
Explanation:
Rick meets all the criteria's of abnormality which includes deviance, personal distress and maladaptive behaviour. He has problems while communicating with people and to maintain healthy relationships which are signs of personal distress. Deviance is also a problem which occurred because of certain group of people who made fun of his appearance. He certainly meets many criteria of abnormality.
Answer:
$304,720
Explanation:
According to the IRS, qualified principal residence indebtedness may include:
1) Debt incurred in order to purchase, build or improve your house or main residence, and the debt is secured by the house or principal residence (mortgage).
Or
2) Any house debt in (1) that is refinanced in order to improve, build or purchase something of your house or principal residence, e.g. you refinance your mortgage in order to build a swimming pool. The loan balance cannot exceed the original mortgage.
A fishing boat is not considered a home improvement, so the equity loan is not considered qualified residence indebtedness.
