We can infer here that what actually happened to Ned is that Mr. Reamer angrily carried him up to beat him up. If I am in Ned's shoes, I will be ashamed.
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference actually refers to the conclusion that one arrives to after evaluating the available and necessary evidences. Inference is known to be reached after observation and experiments have been cried out.
We see here the way Mr. Reamer picked Ned shows that he was angry with what Ned said in Navajo.
If one is in Ned's shoes, such person will be ashamed. This is because such act looks insulting. Mr. Reamer, as stated in the passage is seen to be angry and to have to carry Ned like a puppy.
Learn more about inference on brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
I'd say that the statement from FDR's speeches that uses parallel structure is C. American ships have been sunk; American airplanes have been destroyed.
Both of these independent clauses use the passive form of the verb - in the first clause, the passive form of the verb <em>to sink </em>is used, and in the second, of the verb <em>to destroy.
</em>A parallel structure means that throughout a sentence, the same form of words is used, and given that here both sentences have passive forms, I'd say C is the correct answer.<em>
</em>
The correct answer is D. Abolitionists
Explanation:
The speech "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July" by a former slave, Frederick Douglas, focused on showing the Independence Day and its principles such as freedom or liberty in the U.S. did not protect slaves, and therefore the ideals held by many only applied to part of the population. This tried to show the audience the importance of ending slavery and providing slaves the freedoms white people had.
In this context, this speech would be supported by abolitionist (people that wanted to end slavery) and they would be more receptive to it because they supported the idea of providing freedom and protections to slaves and ending enslavement, which is the focs of the speech.
