The volume of the Apple iPad Mini 2 is 12.561 in³.
The new volume of the Pear-Apple is 24.53 in³.
The new volume of the Pear-Apple is 5.3in³.
The scale factor to have a volume that is half that of the iPad Mini is 0.79.
The scale factor to have a volume that is double that of the iPad Mini is 1.26
<h3 /><h3>What is the volume of the Apple iPad Mini 2?</h3>
Volume = length x width x height
7.9 x 5.30 x 0.30 = 12.561 in³
<h3>What is the volume after the scale factors are applied?</h3>
Dimensions after the 1.25 scale factor is applied: (1.25 x 7.9) x (1.25 x 5.30) x (1.25 x 0.3)
= 9.875 x 6.625 x0.375 = 24.53 in³
Dimensions after the 0.75 scale factor is applied: (0.75 x 7.9) x (0.75 x 5.30) x (0.75 x 0.3)
= 5.925 x 3.975 x 0.225 = 5.3in³
Scale factor to have a volume that is double that of the iPad Mini : 
= 1.26
Scale factor to have a volume that is half that of the iPad Mini : 
= 0.79
To learn more about scale drawings, please check: brainly.com/question/26388230
#SPJ1
Answer:
x + y = 41
x - y = 13
------------------
2x = 54..............We divide 2 such that
x = 27
Then we plug 27 into the equation such that
27 + y = 54.................Subtract 27 to get
y = 14
Step-by-step explanation:
please give me brainliest
Upper Tolerance
Remark
The 11/16 is the only thing that will be affected. The three won't go up or down when we add 1/64 so we should just work with the 11/16. We need only add 11/16 and 1/64 together to see what the upper range is. Later on we can add 3 into the mix.
Solution
<u>Upper Limit</u>
Now change the 11/16 into 64. Multiply numerator and denominator or 11/16 by 4
Which results in
With a final result for the fractions of 45/64
So the upper tolerance = 3 45/64
<u>Lower Tolerance</u>
Just follow the same steps as you did for the upper tolerance except you subtract 1/64 like this.
Your answer should be 3 and 43/64
Answer:
The statement is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
A parallelogram is a figure of four sides, such that opposite sides are parallel
A rectangle is a four-sided figure such that all internal angles are 90°
Here, the statement is:
"A rectangle is sometimes a parallelogram but a parallelogram is always a
rectangle."
Here if we found a parallelogram that is not a rectangle, then that is enough to prove that the statement is false.
The counterexample is a rhombus, which is a parallelogram that has two internal angles smaller than 90° and two internal angles larger than 90°, then this parallelogram is not a rectangle, then the statement is false.
The correct statement would be:
"A parallelogram is sometimes a rectangle, but a rectangle is always a parallelogram"
6.25
explanation: if you divide 6.25 by 5 you get 1.25, if you divide 17.40 by 12 it’s 1.45. Therefore you pay more.
