Answer:
The author uses third-person point of view to tell the overall story, but she uses second-person point of view for a moment to speak to the readers and tell them that they will learn about the Children's March through participants' stories. The people who were there get to tell their stories and express their viewpoints and opinions about the events.
Explanation:
The point is third-person omniscient subjective.
You can tell because the passage states the thoughts/feelings of multiple characters, while not using "I" or "You" or any other first or second person pronouns.
Hope this helped!
Answer: character vs character
Explanation:
In literature, it should be known that character vs. character conflict, is when there is a conflict between two characters. The conflict can result into a physical altercation or can also result in differences between the characters.
Since Jill and Naomi are best friends, but they aren't speaking, then this is a character vs character conflict.
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
Answer:
I would say a relic is a keepsake.
Explanation:
A relic is an object surviving from an earlier time with either historical or sentimental value and is synonymous with keepsake.
