The correct answer to this question is letter "C. Net social contribution." The difference between an organization's positive social contributions and its negative social impacts is called their net social contribution.
Here are the following choices:
A. Social Audit
B. Responsibility impact report.
C. Net social contribution
D. Community commitment level.
Answer:Emotional contagion
Explanation:Emotional contagion is the phenomenon of being influenced by someone else emotion or where someone else's emotions evokes the same emotions from the individuals around them. It can be direct or indirect sometimes just by conscious imagining and analysing another person's emotions we may begin to feel what they feel.
This can create emotional synchrony between people which strengthen the relationship.
Example of emotional contagion is when you find your friend crying it is likely that you will also beging to feel sad and might even cry too.
A lot of people were excited that they made it home from the war alive. A ton had spouses and their spouses were super happy to. Many decided to have a baby.
Answer:
Off season Vegetable production using Irrigation system.
Explanation:off season vegetable production and this will be done using irrigation system. Vegetable are of high demands in the market, it has constitution part of our everyday diet because of the nutrition they supposed to the body. Vitamins and minerals are obtained majority form vegetables we consume example include carrot, cucumber, tomatoes.
During dry season it become very expensive.
Irrigation is artificial supply of water for optimum performance of the crop. When rain cease and dry season approaches, irrigation become the major source of water for the vegetable and it allows for all round production. Different vegetable will be planted and market for sales even during those seasons to boost productivity.
A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
