Answer:
C. acceptance and commitment
Explanation:
In terms of the goal-setting theory, the likelihood that Raj will achieve his sales manager's goal is low due to a lack of acceptance and commitment.
Goal Setting involves developing an action plans created to motivate and guide a group of people or an individual towards a particular or certain goal. and also this can be refer to a situation whereby goal setting help result into higher and better task performance
There's many thing that ASPA stands for, please be more specific as taking a picture. Thank you.
Answer:
A. forming subgoals
Explanation:
In problem solving, subgoals refers to the smaller things that people can achieve which eventually will lead to the end goal. In general, Separating your end goal into subgoals can make it easier for you to track your progress and keep you motivated throughout the process.
<u>In the example above,</u>
The end goal for the students is completing the term paper assignment.
Some people might choose to just force themselves to write the whole thing in a short period of time. But that might cause them to experience a burnout and causes many mistakes on the paper.
Dividing the paper into smaller parts actually make it easier and less demanding.
The professor teach the student to do this by telling them to first submit a topic statement, then a list of references, then a draft of the introduction before eventually finish the content.
Weathering erosion if u need anything else dm me
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
