Answer:
Losses for the producers of Waterworld, if they finished the movie would be <u>$50 million</u>. If they did not finish the movie, losses would be <u>$130 million.</u>
Explanation:
This is because, the difference between all their expenses in making the movie and the revenue generated is actually <em>$50 million</em>. This happens to be their losses while on the other-hand, if they didn't finish making the movie, it would be <em>$130 million </em>(aside the cost spent in finishing the movie after rebuilding the set)
Answer:
When the LARC (Long Run Average Cost) curve slopes downward over the relevant or material range of the output
Explanation:
LRAC stands for Long Run Average Cost, is that curve which represents the average cost, in the long period for producing a given or stated quantity of the output.
So, the one situation which will minimize the efficient scale of operation provide no guidance is when the LARC curve is downward sloping over the material range of the output. It states that the market should be served by a single firm in order to minimize the aggregate cost of the production.
Good quality.good products . good price mostly important income value
I'm guessing it is B because it doesn't have enough information. My reasoning is because: Just because you are buying a house doesn't mean you have kids or will have kids, and if you don't elementary school wouldn't be a factor you will consider
hope this helps