Answer:
Judicial nominations are described in<u> Article II, Section II.</u>
Explanation:
<u>Article II, Section II, also known as the Appointments Clause of the Constitution</u>, gives the President the authority to nominate public officials, including justices of the Supreme Court. However, before the nominee can become a justice, he or she must be rejected or confirmed by the Senate.
In the judicial nominations, then, both the Executive branch and the Legislative branch have a role. This Clause is an example of how the Checks and Balance system works; in this system, each branch of the government oversee, limit and control the other so that no branch abuse from its powers.
The five freedoms listed in the 1st amendment are freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assembly and the right to petition the government.
An amendment is a change or addition designed to improve a text, piece of legislation, etc.
Step one: two-thirds of both houses of Congress pass a proposed constitutional amendment. This sends the proposed amendment to the states for ratification.
Step two: Three-fourths of the states (38 states) ratify the proposed amendment, either by their legislatures or special ratifying conventions.
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects and against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Answer:
OO could use the defense that they gave advice but it was rather the action of the boy that caused the accident not the other way around.
Explanation:
Answer: Madison will not prevail because not every decision that is arbitrary or unfair is discrimination.
Explanation:
Based on the issues discussed in the question, if Madison files a complaint of racial discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC), it is highly unlikely that Madison will prevail based on the facts that were presented in this summary.
Madison already made a complaint to Renee who told her that she gave Sally the job because they are friends and she needed a better job after her divorce. There's no issue regarding discrimination in what happened on this case.
Fro her to prevail, she must prove specific violation in this case or demonstrate a pattern of discrimination in the workplace that has resulted in a race favored over another.
