1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lakkis [162]
3 years ago
13

If anyone want to RP email me at sheaneemathis2006 at g mail .com

Law
2 answers:
Sever21 [200]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I would however I'm just trying to do my math hw

Explanation:

why?

finlep [7]3 years ago
3 0
I’m answering this for points
You might be interested in
What is the purpose of the Executive Office of the President?
hjlf
The answer is C because the executive branch is like a 2nd hand to the president
3 0
2 years ago
30 POINTS!!!!!! PLEASE HELP ME
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

not sure might be he acquired the entire oregon territory from great britain

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Outside of taxing, are there any other ways Arizona is financed?
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

Yes, they make money Intergovermental transfers, and when a state cop pulls you over. Theres also some misc. stuff. But everthing else is just taxes.

Explanation:

These are some examples of how states make their revenue.

6 0
3 years ago
I need help please I will give u brainlist.
pychu [463]
I would not follow my partners instructions. When you are in law you have to always tell the truth even if that means hurting another person who you are close to because of their wrongdoing . If you go along with the lying then that makes you almost as bad as the suspect.
7 0
3 years ago
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about prison research is true?
    11·1 answer
  • Which court decision protected students' rights to free speech as early as 1969?
    10·1 answer
  • Government plays a huge role in the lives of its citizens, impacting them socially, culturally, and politically. And likewise, t
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the reason for a closer relationship between the prime minister and the legislature in a parliamentary democracy.
    13·1 answer
  • Tern for when businesses produce goods and services that consumer do not want​
    8·1 answer
  • Highway engineers use natural laws of physics when designing a roadway.<br><br> true<br> false
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following actions is illegal for selling alcohol
    13·2 answers
  • What are the three characteristics of criminal law
    9·2 answers
  • Explain in a short and friendly manner, as if presenting to a sixth grade class, the importance of Jean Dominique Larrey.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!