All categories

2 years ago

What is the best approximation of the value of w? 1. 4 cm 4. 0 cm 6. 0 cm 7. 3 cm.

Mathematics

1 answer:

MrRissso [65]2 years ago

4 0

To solve the problem we must know about Sine Rule.

The sine rule of trigonometry helps us to equate the side of the triangles to the angles of the triangles. It is given by the formula,

$\dfrac{Sin\ A}{\alpha} =\dfrac{Sin\ A}{\beta} =\dfrac{Sin\ A}{\gamma}$

where

Sin A is the angle and α is the length of the side of the triangle opposite to angle A,
Sin B is the angle and β is the length of the side of the triangle opposite to angle B,
Sin C is the angle and γ is the length of the side of the triangle opposite to angle C.

The value of w is 4.0 cm.

Given to us

VW = 3.3 cm,
∠U = 31°,
∠W = 39°,

<h3>Using the sine law,</h3>

$\dfrac{Sin\ A}{\alpha} =\dfrac{Sin\ A}{\beta} =\dfrac{Sin\ A}{\gamma}$

Substitute the values,

$\dfrac{Sin\ W}{w} = \dfrac{Sin\ U}{VW}$

$\dfrac{Sin\ 39^o}{w}=\dfrac{Sin\ 31^o}{3.3}$

$w=\dfrac{(Sin\ 39^o) \times 3.3}{Sin\ 31^o}$

w = 4.03224 cm ≈ 4.0 cm

Hence, the value of w is 4.0 cm.

Learn more about Sine Rule:

brainly.com/question/17289163

You might be interested in

Find the zeros of y=x^2-8x-3

Anton [14]

This is gonna be the answer. It’s 4+sqrt(19) and 4-sqrt(19). Which is approximately 8.36 and -0.36. In x intercept form, it’s (8.36,0) and (-0.36,0) also I solved this by completing the square. I hope this helps!!! Mark as brainliest!!!

4 0

3 years ago

Following are the published weights (in pounds) of all of the team members of Football Team A from a previous year.178; 203; 212

mylen [45]

Answer:

a. 241; b. 206.0; c. 272.0; d. 174 to 232; other answers (see below).

Step-by-step explanation:

First, at all, we need to organize the data from the smallest to the largest value:

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 241 241 242 245 247 250 250 259 260 260 265 265 270 272 273 275 276 278 280 280 285 285 286 290 290 295 302

This step is important to find the median, the first quartile, and the third quartile. There are numerous methods to find the median and the other quartiles, but in this case, we are going to use a method described by Tukey, and it does not need calculators or software to estimate it.

<h3>Part a: Median</h3>

In this case, we have 53 values (an odd number of values), the median is the value that has the same number of values below and above it, so what is the value that has 26 values below and above it? Well, in the organized data above this value is the 27th value, because it has 26 values above and below it:

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 241 241 242 245 247 250 250 259 260 260 265 265 270 272 273 275 276 278 280 280 285 285 286 290 290 295 302

The median is 241.

<h3>Part b: First Quartile</h3>

For the first quartile, we need to calculate the median for the lower half of the values from the median previously obtained. Since we have an odd number of values (53), we have to include the median in this calculation. We have 27 values (including the median), so the "median" for these values is the value with 13 values below and above it.

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 <em>241</em>

Since we are asking to round the answer to one decimal place, the first quartile is 206.0

<h3>Part c: Third Quartile</h3>

We use the same procedure used to find the first quartile, but in this case, using the upper half of the values.

<em>241</em> 241 242 245 247 250 250 259 260 260 265 265 270 272 273 275 276 278 280 280 285 285 286 290 290 295 302

So, the third quartile is 272.0

<h3>Part d: The middle 50% </h3>

The second quartile is the median and "50% of the data lies below this point" (Quartile (2020), in Wikipedia). Having this information into account, 50% of the weights lies below the median 241.

Thus, the middle 50% of the weights are from 174 to 232.

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 <em>241</em>

<h3>Part e: Sample or Population 1</h3>

If the population were all professional football players, the right option is:

<em>The above data would be a sample of weights because they represent a subset of the population of all football players. </em>

It represents a sample. Supposing Football Team A are all professional, they can be considered a sample from all professional football players.

<h3>Part f: Sample or Population 2</h3>

If the population were Football Team A, the right option is:

<em>The data would be a population of weights because they represent all of the players on Football Team A. </em>

<h3>Part g: population mean and more</h3><h3>Part i</h3>

The mean for the population of weights of Football Team A is the sum of all weights (12529 pounds) divided by the number of cases (53).

$\\ \mu = \frac{12529}{53} = 236.39622641509433$

$\\ \mu = \frac{12529}{53} = 236.40$

The standard deviation for the population is:

$\\ \sigma = \sqrt(\frac{(x_{1}-\mu)^2 + (x_{2}-\mu)^2 + ... + (x_{n}-\mu)^2}{n})$

In words, we need to take either value, subtract it from the population mean, square the resulting value, sum all the values for the 53 cases (in this case, the value is 74332.67924), divide the value by 53 (1402.50338) and take the square root of it (37.45001).

Then, the population standard deviation is 37.45.

The weight that is 3 standard deviations below the mean can be obtained using the following formula:

$\\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}$

$\\ \mu= 236.40\;and\;\sigma=37.45$

Then, in the case of three standard deviations below the mean, z = -3.

$\\ -3 = \frac{x - 236.40}{37.45}$

$\\ x = -3*37.45 + 236.40$

$\\ x = 124.05$

For the player that weights 209 pounds:

$\\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}$

$\\ z = \frac{229 - 236.40}{37.45}$

$\\ z = -0.19$

<h3>Part h: Comparing Weights of Team A and Team B</h3>

For Team B, we have a <em>mean</em> and a <em>standard deviation</em> of:

$\\ \mu=240.08\;and\;\sigma=44.38$

And Player B weighed 229 pounds.

$\\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}$

$\\ z = \frac{229 - 240.08}{44.38}$

$\\ z = -0.70$

This value says that Player B is lighter with respect to his team than Player A, because his weight is 0.70 below the mean of Football Team B, whereas Player A has a weight that is closer to the mean of his team. So, the answer is:

<em>Player B, because he is more standard deviations away from his team's mean weight.</em>

<h3 />

4 0

3 years ago

if a, b, and c are sides of a right triangle, which of the following sides are also sides of a right triangle

suter [353]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If you look at the Pythagorean theorem, a^2 + b^2 = c^2. Therefore if you square root all of sides, getting rid of the square, you will be left with the length of the sides.

5 0

3 years ago

Standard form of 400,000 + 80,000 + 4,000 + 50 + 9

Anna [14]

Hello!

I believe that'll be 484,059.

Hope this helps! ☺♥

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two less than three times a number is 20

kifflom [539]

Answer:

8? correct me if im wrong but this is more accurate than 7!

Step-by-step explanation:

have a great day

5 0

2 years ago