1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wolverine [178]
2 years ago
12

According to the ruling in Dred Scott, Congress was prohibited from

History
2 answers:
Natasha2012 [34]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Prohibiting slavery in the territories.

Explanation:

According to the ruling it was decided that Congress had exceeded their authority when ratifying the Missouri Compromise, and therefore "had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories west of Missouri and north of latitude 36°30" (Britannica.com).

lara31 [8.8K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which answer best describes why towns and cities were built around railroads and canals?
denis-greek [22]
<span>B. The canals and railroads were designed to pass through areas well suited for towns.
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the number that makes the radio equivalent to 4:12
Travka [436]

Answer:

1/3 is your deff answer!

Explanation:

I just did this question myself!

hope it helps!

and brainlest plz

7 0
2 years ago
Plllllllllllsssss someone HELLLLLPPPP... Its very urgent
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

The North American Free Trade Agreement created the world's largest free trade area, covering the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In 2017, its member economies generated approximately $22.2 trillion in gross domestic product. NAFTA is also controversial. Politicians don't agree on whether the free trade agreement's advantages outweigh its disadvantages. Here they are so you can decide for yourself.

Pros

NAFTA has six main advantages. According to a Congressional Research Service report prepared in 2017, the act has more than tripled trade between Canada, Mexico, and the United States since it was enacted.1  The agreement reduced and eliminated tariffs. Second, greater trade increased economic output. While it is challenging to weigh the impact of NAFTA given the variety of factors involved, experts estimated that full NAFTA implementation would U.S. growth by as much as 0.5% a year.2  Third, while there are varying estimates, stronger growth created jobs. According to a 2010 report, U.S. free trade agreements – the lion's share of which stemmed from the NAFTA agreement – directly supported 5.4 million jobs, while trade with these countries supported 17.7 million.3   Fourth, foreign direct investment (FDI) more than tripled. The United States increased FDI in Mexico from $15.2 billion in 1993 to $104.4 billion in 2012, and from $69.9 billion in Canada in 1993 to $352.9 billion in 2015. Mexico ramped up investment in the United States by 1283% over the same time period, while Canada's FDI increased by 911%. Fifth, NAFTA lowered prices. U.S. oil imports from Mexico cost less because NAFTA got rid of tariffs. That reduces America's reliance on oil from the Middle East. Low-cost oil reduces gas prices, which reduces transportation cost. Food prices are lower in turn. 4  Sixth, the agreement helped with government spending. Each nation's government contracts became available to suppliers in all three member countries. That increased competition and lowered costs.

Cons

NAFTA has six main disadvantages. First, certain estimates indicate that it led to job losses. A 2011 report from the Economic Policy Institute estimated a loss of 682,900 jobs.5  Other estimates estimate a loss of 500,000-750,000 U.S. jobs. Most were in the manufacturing industries in California, New York, Michigan, and Texas. Though the estimated job gains exceed those lost, certain industries were particularly impacted, including manufacturing, automotive, textile, computer, and electrical appliance industries. Second, job migration suppressed wages. Companies threatened to move to Mexico to keep workers from joining unions.6  Without the unions, workers could not bargain for better wages. This strategy was so successful that it became standard operating procedure. Between 1993 and 1995, half of all companies used it. By 1999, that rate had grown to 65%. Third, NAFTA put Mexican farmers out of business. It allowed U.S. government-subsidized farm products into Mexico. Local farmers could not compete with the subsidized prices. As a result, 1.3 million farmers were put out of business, according to the Economic Policy Institute.7  It forced unemployed farmers to cross the border illegally to find work. In 1995, there were 2.9 million Mexicans living in the United States illegally. It increased to 4.5 million in 2000, probably due to NAFTA.8  The recession drove that figure to 6.9 million in 2007. In 2014, it fell to 5.8 million, roughly double where it was before NAFTA. Fourth, unemployed Mexican farmers went to work in substandard conditions in the maquiladora program. Maquiladora is where United States-owned companies employ Mexican workers near the border. They cheaply assemble products for export back into the United States. Employment in maquiladoras rose 120,000 in 1980 to 1.2 million in 2006.9   Fifth, U.S. companies degraded the Mexican environment to keep costs low. Agribusiness in Mexico used more fertilizers and other chemicals, resulting in increased pollution.10  Rural farmers were forced into marginal land to stay in business, resulting in increased deforestation rates.11  That deforestation contributes to global warming. Sixth, NAFTA allowed Mexican trucks access into the United States. Mexican trucks are not held to the same safety standards as American trucks. Congress never allowed this provision to go into effect.

USMCA

Despite these advantages, the United States, Mexico, and Canada renegotiated NAFTA on September 30, 2018. The new deal is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. It must be ratified by each country's legislature. Trump has called for Congress to ratify it within six months.14  If not ratified, it the U.S. will revert to pre-NAFTA trade conditions. If ratified, it will go into effect in 2020. The Trump administration renegotiated with the aim of lowering the trade deficit between the United States and Mexico.15  The new deal changes NAFTA in six major areas.16  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Should the First Amendment protect hate speech? Why or why not?
larisa [96]

Answer:

Not sure

Explanation:

I got this question on my test too

4 0
3 years ago
Anybody got a social media accout to help me i cant pay for app
Black_prince [1.1K]
How do you use the links I have been seeing them everywhere
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement accurately describes the U.S. government's handling of Japanese Americans during World War II?
    10·2 answers
  • Did the british act wisely in dealing with the colonists between 1765-1775
    9·1 answer
  • Us history what happen in 1494
    13·1 answer
  • Eric wants to collect data about the reading habits of his friends.
    9·2 answers
  • Why do you think the delegates to the 1st Continental Congress believes that refusing to buy British goods would help their caus
    5·1 answer
  • Hitler Quickly took over much of Europe by launching a _____
    9·2 answers
  • Successful New World colonies were started by all except:
    12·2 answers
  • Why was letting seawater evaporate in the sun not an sufficient, or good, method for obtaining salt?
    9·1 answer
  • The text states that defending the US against terrorism is difficult. Why was especially difficult to defend against a threat l
    6·1 answer
  • Em hiểu thế nào là người tối cổ
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!