True or false: The transfer of costs from one inventory account to the next parallels the physical transfer of goods from one in
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:<em>True cost = </em>
<em>= </em>
<em>= $ 13,669,821.2</em>
Explanation:
Given :
Debt-Equity ratio = 0.55
Flotation cost for new equity = 6%
Flotation cost for debt = 3 %
∴ To compute the weighted flotation cost , we'll use the following formula:
Weighted Flotation cost =
=
= 0.0387 + 0.0106
= 0.04934 or 4.93%
The true cost of building the new assembly line after taking flotation costs into account is evaluated using the following formula :
True cost =
=
= $ 13,669,821.2
Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
