Answer:
Nznbz xs:debug ushsjsj hzjjhsbjhzb hs
Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
Answer:
<h3>Option D, Laches.</h3>
Explanation:
Latches is the legal practice that does not allow a legal right or claim to be enforced or allowed if there has been a long delay in asserting the right or claim of that particular case.
This is done because some cases or claims which could've solved years back is being delayed to maximize the consequence of the defendant.
For instance, Bill decides not to file a case against Bart for property line encroachment but waits for few years until Bart builds a new house on that land which has Bill's name on it.
Answer:
The following explains the outcome and significance of the District of Columbia v. Heller case,
The Supreme Court decided in favor of Heller, that the Second Amendment allows law-abiding U.S. citizens to own and carry handguns in the district.
Explanation: In the 2008 landmark Supreme Court Case The District of Columbia v. Heller, it was found that the Second Amendment allows LAW ABIDING citizens to own and carry handguns in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC). This case found the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 as unconstitutional. The Act of 1975 called for handguns used for home and self defense to be unloaded, disassembled, and/or locked.
The structures would make the people there more economy by stimulating it with workers and it would help socially as it would build communities
