I agree because if no one had a reason as to why they did the idea, how would we have known how to do it ourselves.
Rock and mountain correlation are evidence for continental drift because Fossil correlation and mountain correlation are both evidence for Continental Drift.
According to Wegener, the presence of the same plant fossils on different planets are enough proofs that these planets shifted apart from each other.
The presence of fossils helped to agree with the theory of continental drift. Fossils from the same group of animals that have the same age have been found on different parts of the world.
According to him, the mountains are formed side by side to each other and the surrounding land have since moved apart.
Read more on brainly.com/question/7299739?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
<em>These </em><em>are </em><em>harmful </em><em>effects </em><em>of </em><em>earth </em><em>and </em><em>it's </em><em>natural</em><em> </em><em>systems </em><em>due </em><em>to </em><em>the </em><em>action </em><em>of </em><em>humans.</em>
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em>
<span>I think that the procedures are different from normal crime scenes because there is a potential threat of the evidence becoming damaged or evaporate. A benefit of the the procedure is that the evidence can be collected quickly without the need of a search warrant.</span>
<span>C. Wright Mills had a negative view of the elite-mass dichotomy. His viewpoint fits into the following paradigm: <u>conflict.
</u><u />The other options don't really make sense: symbolic interactionism is incorrect because there is no interaction here. Functionalism is also not true because his negative views don't really serve any function in the society. And feminism obviously doesn't fit here, which means that the conflict paradigm is correct.<u>
</u></span>
