The answer is Marbury v. Madison
Answer:
I'm thinking 3
Explanation: It can't be 4, the government has little to no control over free trade. I don't think it's 2 either because I don't think it's international. 3 mostly matches the description of free trade. Hope this helped
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
Answer:
peer pressure, cultural adaptation.
Explanation:
