Answer:
Slavery
Explanation:
Several perspectives were created in the mid-1800s that were focused on determining which individuals or groups are most likely to commit crime. These perspectives were likely developed in relation to slavery.
Answer: It's true, this is an example of consumer misbehavior, however there are some factors to consider.
Explanation: Although it is pretty evident that Michelle bought the dress in the first place because she liked it, what was done afterwards can be labeled as misbehavior for her plan to have the money back despite the article she already used for the ocassion she planned to attend with it. However, the cashier plays his/her part with the story because there is no evidence of refusal coming from what Michelle intends to do.
Would you please be able to provide a picture of the painting? It is very hard to help without it.
Answer:
Like my comment, moreover rate 5 stars
The statement about the cases such as Lochner v. New York (1905) and Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) is: False.
<h3 /><h3>What was the Supreme Court Ruling?</h3>
The ruling by the Supreme court in both cases gave more rights to the individuals involved than the federal or state government.
In the Lochner v. New York (1905) case, the supreme court ruled that it was unlawful for the New York State Law to set the maximum working hours for bakers because it violated their rights.
In the second case, the court ruled against a federal law that promoted child labor.
Learn more about the principle of self-government here:
brainly.com/question/6347343