Answer:
The issue is whether Joe is liable to pay for Bob to Avarice Bank or not.
Joe should prevail.
Explanation:
The original contract is between bank and Bob and in that contract Joe is not involved. Secondly payment on someone' behalf always has to be a written contract.
According to UCC, suretyships have to be written for them to be enforceable. This is mentioned in Statute of Frauds. It clearly states that any gurantee by thrid party for payment of debts has to be in writing.
Answer:
The answer is c. present value index
Explanation:
Present value index is the ratio decided by dividing net present value of the project by its require initial net cash outflows.
Once having constraint on selecting investment with positive NPV to be made due to lack of fund, a firm's usually use Present value index for further decision making.
The investment with higher present value index shows that it generates more net cash flow or in other words, more efficient and requires less initial cash outflow, and thus usually be chosen over the other ones with lower present value index.
Answer:
mack tax basis in prairee on 31 december = 307000
correct option is a. $307,000
Explanation:
given data
tax basis = $320,000
net business income = $152,000
services rendered = $4,000
distribution = $50,000
solution
we know allocated income is here
allocated income = net business income - guaranteed payment
allocated income = 152000 - 4000
allocated income = 148000
so
mack share of net income is 25 % of allocated income
mack share of net income = 37000
so
mack tax basis in prairee on 31 december = 320000 + 37000 - 50000
mack tax basis in prairee on 31 december = 307000
I agree with the first person
Phishing is one of the most prevalent of all Internet scams. Phishing scams attempt to trick people into providing sensitive personal information such as credit card or banking details. What is common is that y<span>ou receive an email with an urgent or time-sensitive message requesting them to act immediately.</span>
