<span>The answer is d) All of the above. Like playing the 'telephone game', when one person passes information on to another the information can be distorted by things like their ability to remember it clearly and their own feelings about the content. They may also add or take away from the content based on their own life experiences and feelings.</span>
The way in which Plato and More discuss members of the ruling class differently is D. Plato tries to remedy the social divide, while more provides a plan for their governing style.
<h3>What is a Ruling Class?</h3>
This refers to the hierarchy of rule that allows a group of elites to be in charge of the governing of the people,.
Hence, we can see that The way in which Plato and More discuss members of the ruling class differently is D. Plato tries to remedy the social divide, while more provides a plan for their governing style.
Read more about Plato here:
brainly.com/question/742055
#SPJ1
Reformers fought to end the system of apartheid, which limited the rights of black Africans.
Or
Pro-government and anti-government factions engaged in a civil war for equal rights.
The correct answer is A) True.
It is true that analyzing eyewitness accounts of the Battle of Gettysburg is an example of qualitative research.
When historians do research and analyze this type of source, they want to get interesting and alternative qualitative information about what happened during that historical battle during the American Civil War.
Although the witness could have different interpretations of reality, these point of views serves the researcher to support his work.
The battle of Gettysburg was a bloody battle during the Civil War. The Union Army fought the Confederates under General Robert Lee's command. The battle was fought in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania from July 1 to July 3, 1863. Historians say that the number of casualties for the North was 23,000 and for the South, 28,000. The Union Army won the battle and it represented the beginning of the end of the Civil War.
