Since AIDS results from a private act that has extreme social consequences, serious moral and legal questions also arise about the rights of Individuals versus the welfare of the society.
<h3>What are morals?</h3>
Morals are lessons gotten from experiences, they are standards of behavior and principles of what is right or wrong.
Individuals are to be sensitized against the dangers of the deadly disease as well as the society at large to curb the spread of the disease which will result in social consequences which will question our morality.
Read more about <em>morals</em> here:
brainly.com/question/25645043
Explanation:
Lex talionis means treating the criminals in the way the criminals treated the victims. In means giving the same sufferings to others as others have caused them suffering.
This principle is not plausible because according to Nathanson, it will make us to act in an immoral way with others. We cannot hijack the hijacker's plane because they did to us. We cannot spy on others because others are spying on us. Nathanson objected the principle because he believes that it is not possible to measure sufferings of others as different people suffered differently. So we cannot bring equal suffering.
Answer:
environment, convergent evolution
Explanation:
When two species with no immediate common ancestors are exposed to same kind of environment they might develop body parts which have similar functions leading to convergent evolution. The resultant body parts are known as analogous structures. Here, both Patagonian hares and England rabbits were exposed to similar environment so even though their body structures had different origin, they developed to be similar in function. They are in contrast to homologous structures which develop due to divergent evolution where the origin of the structure is same but they diverge due to different functions.
I can only answer the last four so yeah.
B
A
C
C or D
