Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
<u>She is using a combinations of perspectives to treat different clients.</u>
Eclectic approach is a strategy for language instruction that joins different methodologies and philosophies to encourage dialect relying upon the points of the exercise and the capacities of the learners. Different training techniques are obtained and adjusted to suit the necessity of the students. It breaks the repetitiveness of the class. What's more, It is a calculated methodology that does not only incorporate one worldview or an arrangement of suppositions. Rather, diversity holds fast to or is established from a few hypotheses, styles, and thoughts to pick up an intensive understanding about the subject, and draws upon various speculations in various cases.
The revolution affected the woman because they had to help out with the soldiers and do things like, sewing clothes, cooking, carrying water, and nursing the sick or hurt soldiers back to health.
The revolution affected the slaves because they were offered a chance to fight in the war for their freedom.
Hope this helped
Answer:
Hot to cold
Explanation:
Heat is always the transfer of energy from an object at a higher temperature, so energy flows from the particles that are warm to the cold
Answer:
B. unconditioned response (UCR)
Explanation:
Unconditioned response: In psychology, the term unconditioned response is a part of the classical conditioning theory which was proposed by Ivan Pavlov. The unconditioned response is defined as an unconnected or unlearned response that generally arises naturally concerning the unconditioned stimulus.
The unconditioned response is also denoted as UCR and is considered as behavior that arises as a result of specific stimuli.
In the question above, the statement signifies the unconditioned response.
