The rhetorical or facetious question adds to the section's focal thought of the selection above is that it fortifies the rights given to others are not stretched out to African Americans.
I trust the appropriate response will help you.
Answer:
A. Nikolai's dual character
Explanation:
Forking rivers or paths are commonly used to express a character's opposing features in literature. In this case, it represents Nikolai's two sides - stern and caring. The river merges into one at the end - implying that his two sides can coexist.
B. It also shows how much Travis has changed in years, his personality is very different than what it used to be since Old Yeller came. Hes now drawn closer to Arliss, and also drawn closer to his family!
Answer:
i believe it is the first one
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is "The emphasis of the speech stays on Wiesel's frightening experiences as a child." Wiesel's use of the first person allows him to give a more individual view of the story as a whole. These are his knowledges, they are not neutral because this is his story. The first person is the finest way for him to deliver the things he needs to tell, and the third person would have through the story more universal not personal.
Explanation:
I know that this is none of the answer choices but I hope it helps (:
