Name the three main fossil fuels

In the context of the text, how has America changed over time? How did America’s treatment of African Americans change through h

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not attach the text, the name of the text, or a link to it. Without the text, we can not cite evidence of it.

But what we can do in order to help you is to comment in the following general terms.

Yes, the United States has changed a lot in some ways over time; however, in others, change has been slow, very slow. As it is the case of racism.

How did America’s treatment of African Americans change through history, and how has it changed since this speech was delivered in 1963?

Without a doubt, the work and the fight for civil rights of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr had a deep impact on some portions of the American Society and his legacy has been followed by many activists.

There are places in the United States where whites, African Americans, and other minorities groups live in perfect harmony. Unfortunately, that is not teh case in other parts, as we witnessed in many terrible events during the year 2020.

Martin Luther King, Jr. basically demanded in his speech equity and justice for African Americans. That was the powerful intention of the "I Have a Dream Speech," delivered by King during the March on Washington in 1963.

3 0

3 years ago

Sophia subscribes to the theory that government policies in a democracy are influenced by the continual processes of bargaining

777dan777 [17]

Her idea is best associated with pluralist as she believed policies in a democracy are influenced by the continual processes of bargaining among numerous groups.

<h3>What is a Pluralism?</h3>

This is a political belief that encourages diversity within a political system so as to ensure a peaceful coexistence of different interests among the people.

Therefore, the idea of Pluralism is best associated with Sophia.

Read more about Pluralism

brainly.com/question/9704348

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

The governments of most Central Asian countries today can best be characterized as

Maksim231197 [3]

After the fall of the former Soviet Union and the rapid disappearance of communism in Europe, the population of the former Soviet States were extremely happy about the situation, and with the help of the West most of the countries in this region made a move to democracy. These principal Central Asian countries are Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

Unfortunately, ten years later the jubilation about the democratization process in this region has gone sour, and the reality today is that most of these countries are turning into Dictatorships. Even though, the governments of these countries promised to support democratic ruled, they are now clearly embarked in non-democratic ruled.

The western democracies are alarmed by these trend, and they are trying to do what they can but no one knows what the results will be.

6 0

3 years ago

A special vote on a specific issue

Inessa [10]

The correct answer is a referendum. This a juridical procedure in which it is submitted to vote of the population a law or a particular matter relevant for the govern. This mean obtains the popular consultation. Another name for this is the plebiscite.

A province is an area of specialized knowledge, interest or responsibility. Also refers to an administrative division of a country.

The Quebec act knows as the British North America Quebec Act was signed in 1774 and determined the procedures of governance in the province of Quebec (Canada) regarding its territory, religious matters, civil law among other issues.

Finally, the Brexit is a political act, (means Britain exit) from the European Union. Took place in 2006, and was done through a referendum where the people were asked if they wanted to continue being part of the European Union or not. 52% of the population voted in favor of leaving the Union.

8 0

3 years ago

Why did the United States invade Iraq in 2003?

VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.

Explanation:

The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. Other purposes were to end the harboring of terrorists in the land and eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of.

The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.

5 0

4 years ago

Name the three main fossil fuels ​

Name the three main fossil fuels