In 150 words or more, explain how terrorist organizations are identified. What features need to be in place in order for an orga
nization to be considered an “FTO”? What is the process involved with placing the organization on the State Department’s list? Do you think this is an effective method for combatting terrorism? Why or why not?
“Surprise, when it happens to a government, is likely to be a complicated, diffuse, bureaucratic thing. It includes neglect of responsibility but also responsibility so poorly defined or so ambiguously delegated that action gets lost. It includes gaps in intelligence, but also intelligence that, like a string of pearls too precious to wear, is too sensitive to give to those who need it. It includes the alarm that fails to work, but also the alarm that has gone off so often it has been disconnected. It includes the unalert watchman, but also the one who knows he'll be chewed out by his superior if he gets higher authority out of bed. It includes the contingencies that occur to no one, but also those that everyone assumes somebody else is taking care of. It includes straightforward procrastination, but also decisions protracted by internal disagreement. It includes, in addition, the inability of individual human beings to rise to the occasion until they are sure it is the occasion-- which is usually too late. (Unlike movies, real life provides no musical background to tip us off to the climax.) Finally, as at Pearl Harbor, surprise may include some measure of genuine novelty introduced by the enemy, and possibly some sheer bad luck.
The results, at Pearl Harbor, were sudden, concentrated, and dramatic. The failure, however, was cumulative, widespread, and rather drearily familiar. This is why surprise, when it happens to a government, cannot be described just in terms of startled people. Whether at Pearl Harbor or at the Berlin Wall, surprise is everything involved in a government's (or in an alliance's) failure to anticipate effectively.”
Buddhism on a large scale never appealed to the Chinese historically. If you do a historical study of Buddhism in China it was largely resisted for a very long time. This was mainly because it was diametrically opposed to traditional Chinese culture.
Chinese traditional culture valued hard work and they did not have respect for buddhist monks who would beg for their food.
Chinese traditional culture ate meat like pork and buddhists were not allowed to eat these things.
Chinese traditional culture drank alcohol and buddhists were not allowed to drink alcohol.
Chinese traditional culture valued family and children while buddhists were taught to no marry and not have children.
In general it was white men own owned property who maintained power in the government of the colonies, and these were the same people who could vote in local and state elections.
<span> the Federal Radio Commission act of 1927 Creates several regulations for Broadcasters and will forced them to shut down if they did not comply. In the federal communications act of 1934, the same regulations apply to I</span><span>nterstate telephone, telegraphy, and internet. Both these regulations is an effort by the government to control the flow of information in Media.</span>
