My personal opinion on whether companies should keep a standardized approach or adapt to local markets is:
- They should adapt to local markets because the needs of the people can easily sustain the business and the business can change their policies based on changing outcomes.
<h3>What is a Local Markets?</h3>
This refers to the demand of customers for a particular good or service in a given area and this is a better method than standardization as this would help to sustain the business.
With this in mind, we can see that adaptation to local markets is vital because this would enable the business owner to analyse the needs of the people and supply them.
Read more about local markets here:
brainly.com/question/25629927
Complete question:
Lovely lawns, inc., intends to use sales of lawn fertilizer to predict lawn mower sales. the store manager estimates a probable six-week lag between fertilizer sales and mower sales. the pertinent data are:
Period Fertilizer Sales (tons) Number of Mowers Sold (six-week lag)
1 1.4 9
2 1 7
3 1.5 10
4 1.8 12
5 2.1 13
6 1.5 7
7 1.3 5
8 1.2 5
9 1.6 8
10 1.3 7
11 1.6 11
12 1.3 9
13 1.4 10
14 1.8 12
a. Graph these data to see whether a linear equation might describe the relationship between fertilizer and mowers.
b. Obtain a linear regression line for the data
c. Predict expected lawn mower sales for Period 15, given fertilizer sales six weeks earlier of 2.3 tons.
Solution:
a. Find the attachment for graph
b.
Fertilizer Mowers
x y
1.4 9 1.96 81 12.6
1 7 1 49 7
1.5 10 2.25 100 15
1.8 12 3.24 144 21.6
2.1 13 4.4 116 27.3
1.5 7 2.25 49 10.5
1.35 5 1.69 25 6.5
1.2 5 1.44 25 6
1.6 8 2.56 64 12.8
1.3 7 1.69 49 9.1
1.6 11 2.56 121 17.6
1.3 9 1.69 81 11.7
1.4 10 1.96 100 14
1.8 12 3.24 144 21.6
Σ =20.8 125 31.94 1201 193.3
x = 1.486
y = 8.929
EXY- nXY 193.3- (149.486 -1.486)
Calculated using the formula b =9 = 31 .94 - (14 *1. 486 *1 A86 ) =7.31405
X2 - 7.31405
Calculated using Excel a =Y - bX = 8.929 - 7.31405 *1.486 = -1.938017
Y = a + bx = -1.93802 + 7.31405x
c. Using the formula
Y = a + bx = -1.58678 + 7.033058x
= 14.8843
Using Excel's Forecast
Forecast - 14.58926
Answer:
D. It makes all citizens pay the same percentage of their income in
taxes.
Explanation:
A proportional tax system imposes the same tax rate for all individuals regardless of the level of income. For example, if the tax rate is set at 5%, all taxpayers will be taxed at that rate. A person earning $10,000 will pay $500 (5% of 10,000) while the one earning $100,000 ( 5% of 5000)will pay $5,000.
A proportion tax system is also known as the Flat rate system. It is easy to compute and implement. The propositional tax system may appear to be fair because it treats all taxpayers equally and encourages people to earn more. However, it places a heavy tax burden on low-income earners.
Solution :
a). The suspect may experience some emotional changes that are not necessarily due to a scandal or scam. We need to establish that the proper figures and facts are to be analyzed before reaching the conclusion. But however, the primary conclusion is that something is going on on the suspect's mind that needs to be further dealing. (2) increment in the income needs to be validated and also proper root cause of the changes should be analyzed.
b). No from the above facts we cannot conclude that the suspect had committed financial frauds. For this a full proof validation of the facts and the evidences are required for a solid conclusion for helding the suspect for committing financial frauds. Hence further investigation is needed for deriving a conclusion.